"The press has been very sensitive to the Contempt of Court Act and the
result was that the public were not aware of the threat. The press
were very, very careful not to speculate on what had been going on
which had led to these charges," said Rozenberg.
This reticence resulted in increased
media access to material shown to juries - an attempt, said Rozenberg, to
enhance broadcast and print coverage so the public 'can actually
understand what is going on'.
"The more pictures that are available the more coverage there
will be and its in the public interest for these terror trials to be
publicised," he added.
Nick Davies, author of Flat Earth News, questioned
whether this move could lead to more defendants claiming that their
trials had been prejudiced.
Davies also expressed concern about journalists and the practice of media recycling 'false information' from the police.
"What's happening is that reporters are simply being fed colourful
stories by the police press offices and they are happy to rely on
them. True or not they just bang them out," he said, citing the case of the Forest Gate shooting as an example.
However, Rozenberg argued that journalists had a duty to cover such
stories:
"It's not that they are happy to rely on them, what are the
press to do in those circumstances? We must be sceptical certainly, but
we have got to report that, if only later on we find it isn't borne out
by the facts."