Our RSS feeds
LATEST JOBS:
resize text: decrease text sizereset text size increase text size

Online Journalism News

'Post-moderated system' could reduce need for sub-editors, says Telegraph assistant editor

Screenshot of Telegraph.co.uk The Telegraph is experimenting with a post-moderated sub-editing system online, its assistant editor told an industry gathering last night.

The trial, aimed at reducing production costs for the publisher, is part of the 'bleak future' faced by print sub-editors, said Justin Williams, assistant editor of Telegraph Media Group, at the New Media Knowledge (NMK) 'What happens to newspapers?' event.

Speaking to Journalism.co.uk, Williams said the system, which would allow journalists to publish directly to Telegraph.co.uk before their content is moderated, was being used in only a few content areas online.

Its aim, he added, is to improve the efficiency of the writing and production process by establishing what line and format a piece of content will take at the point of commissioning.

Such systems are being trialled in response to an industry-wide need to reduce production costs, Williams told the audience.  60 per cent of TMG's publishing budget is spent on the means of production, while 40 per cent is used for content-generation, he added.

"The cost of publishing has now fallen to zero and that's ultimately what we're struggling with. We have to get to a point where our journalists deliver their content to whoever wants to get it and it has to cost us nothing to do that if we are to survive," he said.

"What does that mean for sub-editors? I would not become a sub-editor now. The future for sub-editing is bleak, there may still be a future, but we have to drive down costs."

Tim Gopsill, fellow panellist and editor of the National Union of Journalists' (NUJ) magazine, The Journalist, raised concerns that such changes could reduce the quality of online newspaper content.

"Once you remove the process of refining material to meet your brand, you're not having a process of quality control at all," said Gopsill.

While Williams said he agreed that quality of content was important, driving down production costs should be a 'commerical priority' for publishers.

"We're talking about the survival of the brands in themselves and that's the commercial priority as an industry: our very survival. It's all well having pieces read over and over again checked by many people, but at the end of the day those businesses will go under," he said.

Despite the possibility of sub-editor job cuts, Williams said there will be new employment opportunities in 'content generation' for journalists and data practitioners.

"We're going to need lots of people to help us move in areas that we are already in and into new areas, to create content in imaginative new ways. But it [the future] will not be about the interminable multi-staged editing process," he said.

Tags (click tag to find related articles; click icon for feed):
events | telegraph | telegraph media group | nmk | justin williams | sub editing |

Sign up here for our free, daily email newsletter to get all the latest stories, jobs, tips and more.

Got a story? Email our news team: Laura Oliver; Judith Townend or telephone +44 (0)1273 384290. You can also follow us on Twitter: @journalismnews / @LauraOliver / @JTownend.

Comments

May I make a suggestion for driving down production costs: stop overpaying executives and columnists while putting experienced journalists working on news and sports desks out of work. I wonder how Mr Williams climbed the greasy pole to become assistant editor. Did he pass through the role of sub-editor at some point? This is not about driving down production costs, it is about driving down standards. Will we soon have a computer programme able to attend news events and report back, reducing the need for reporters as well? Do these executives really not realise the lack of quality that comes direct from many "writers"?
Nigel Henderson - 29/10/08

Justin Williams, assistant editor of Telegraph Media Group,is clearly an idiot. Does he understand what a sub-editor does? I shudder to imagine what would happen if some of the stories I've subbed had been published 'raw". Mr Williams seems to think subs just pick up the odd typo or two and he's quite ok with that. May I point out that it will only take one multi-million dollar libel suit and all his savings on sub-editors salaries will be wiped out in a hearbeat.
- 05/11/08

You must be registered in order to post a comment. Click here to register or login below if you are already registered:

    

Forgotten your password? Please click here



JOB OF THE WEEK

Online content producer (full-time contract - six months)

With experience writing for online and working to daily deadlines, expertise in home products and the ability to turn complex technical copy into an online story that answers key consumer questions for Which? ...more

Freelancers for hire

...see all

DISPLAY ADVERTISING

image

Target our journalism community of 17,200 subscribers and 140k+ visitors monthly. Call Chris on 01273 384291

Advertisements

How fast is your broadband?

Broadband Speed

Test your speed now

Click for
mobile broadband deals from Mobile Broadband Genie


Compare Broadband

Alternatively take a look at mobile broadband packages.