This is an edited excerpt of Charlie Beckett's post 'MPs' Expenses And The Media: chequebook journalism pays for political lessons'. The original post was published on Beckett's POLIS blog.
The Telegraph's revelations on MPs' expenses is biggest political story of the year and yet also the smallest. While Britain plunges into recession we are arguing about whether a hard-working politician should be allowed to claim for a few hundred pounds of gardening, house repairs or plumbing.
Chequebook journalism by a right wing newspaper has laid a Labour government low and yet no one seems to be blaming the media with any success. The charge of corruption, indifference and disdain levelled at the politicians of all colours seems to have too much resonance for anyone to worry seriously about the messenger.
If you are interested, let's think through two aspects of this. The journalistic and the political. They are linked.
Firstly, when should journalists pay for this kind of information? I am led to believe that the Telegraph shelled out about £90,000. If this figure is true it is is far less than the oft-quoted £300k. Either way, I think it is terrific value compared with the way that the Telegraph has set the agenda and given the public some extraordinary information.
In this case I think that the public interest defence overwhelmingly slaughters any ethical conundrum. No one can doubt that we have every right to know this information. The only people who were seeking to keep it secret were the people who benefitted from the closeted, corrupt arrangement. That is, the MPs. If we waited till they unveiled it in the summer we would have gained less information and on their terms.
YouTube if you want to
Recent efforts to take government and politics online made me think
that parliament was perhaps starting to catch up with the late 20th if
not 21st century. But, in fact, politicians see new media technology
like YouTube and blogs as fresh weapons in old wars rather than than a
fresh way of doing politics. That is why we got the McBride email/blogging smear scandal.
Yes, they were going to release a version of the information on expenses in the summer, but it would have lacked the crucial details which reveal the cheap tricks employed by the MPs to garner extra income from you, the taxpayer. And remember, these are the politicians who are chasing benefit cheats and who promise a government of 'thrift'.
Why don't MPs get it? Why do they think it is enough to say that it is 'within the rules'. Why do they resist transparency while insisting on their right to invade every aspect of our lives? They must have a sense that their profession (like mine) has never been less attractive to the public. So why do they do the one thing that confirms the citizen's prejudices about politics and those who practice it?
Failure to understandOnline politics will be the subject of one of the forthcoming Polis/Channel 4iP debates.
Tags (click tag to find related articles; click icon for feed):
telegraph
|
politics
|
ethics
|
charlie beckett
|
Sign up here for our free, daily email newsletter to get all the latest stories, jobs, tips and more.
Got a story? Email our news team: Laura Oliver; Judith Townend or telephone +44 (0)1273 384290. You can also follow us on Twitter: @journalismnews / @LauraOliver / @JTownend.
With experience writing for online and working to daily deadlines, expertise in home products and the ability to turn complex technical copy into an online story that answers key consumer questions for Which? ...more
London & the north west, United Kingdom
London, United Kingdom
Stockport, United Kingdom
Target our journalism community of 17,200 subscribers and 140k+ visitors monthly. Call Chris on 01273 384291
Broadband Speed
Click for
mobile broadband deals from Mobile Broadband Genie
Comments
No comments
You must be registered in order to post a comment. Click here to register or login below if you are already registered:
Forgotten your password? Please click here