Browse > Home / Archive by category 'Filter content'

| Subscribe via RSS

Making the most of RSS: readers reviewed

By Colin Meek (@colinmeek) and Judith Townend (@JTownend)

Reports of the “death of RSS” are not only greatly exaggerated – they are simply wrong. Not only is RSS part of the fabric of the internet, tapping that resource through RSS Readers is still an important and valuable component of a researcher’s toolset.

As a quick re-cap, RSS (Really Simple Syndication) readers allow you to track the content feeds from different websites. In other words, you can monitor a number of sites without visiting those sites individually. Use an RSS reader to work more efficiently – that’s the theory.

The practice is often disappointing however. People often find RSS readers (and web-based readers in particular) frustrating and difficult to configure. If you subscribe to a range of general feeds (such as BBC news feeds) and content-specific feeds you can feel overwhelmed by the tsunami of posts that appear. Subscribe to several dozen feeds and you quickly need some way to filter and focus the content further.

Of course, Twitter and email alert services can be used in conjunction with RSS, but think of Twitter as the live broadcast, and RSS as the TV catch-up and what’s on guide. No matter how long you’ve been offline, it’s really easy to see what new content has been published on your chosen sites.

If you do need to monitor many active feeds then you need to choose a reader that can filter out the noise so you can monitor posts for specific keywords, categories or tags. If you’re determined to see everything written about a subject, follow the results of a specific search term by RSS – it can be easier to track than Google alerts to your email inbox, for example.

In this post, we review a number of different RSS readers that will help you stay on top of a range of feeds from a number of sources.

Web-based: Google Reader

Google Reader is a fantastic basic reader to collect feeds, but can be infuriating to use as your main tool. It can slightly lag and is a little cumbersome for organising your feeds into different folders.

It has its advantages however: it’s easy to add feeds to Google Reader from your browser and you can sync it with another desktop or mobile reader. It’s easy to publicly share stories with your followers, and send stories to other social networks, such as Twitter, StumbleUpon and Tumblr, for example.

Another nice feature is that Google recommends feeds to you. The recommendations are automatically generated and take into account your existing feed subscriptions.

Items can be tagged and ordered fairly easily. Google has a “magic” sort, which is its attempt to put your feeds in the “most relevant and interesting order”. You can view feeds by ‘list’ or ‘expanded’ view.

Here’s how Google Reader looks in your browser:

The other reviewed readers can be synced with your base Google Reader. The advantage of this is that you have a web-based back up of your feeds and it’s easy to switch news aggregator when something better comes along. But the big plus for doing this is that you can view your feeds from wherever you are – on phone, laptop, work and home computers – and they’ll all be synced.

There are a number of Google Reader bookmarklets to pop in your browser bar for quick read, subscription and share options.

Additionally, there are a number of  shortcuts you can use while in Google Reader. See below:

Finally, for a bit of fun, have a play with Google’s ‘Reader Play’. Perhaps not the most efficient way of scanning stories, but it could be a pleasant way of flicking through your reader while you’re eating your breakfast:

Google Reader does not have more sophisticated filter options yet, but its forum suggests using an external service like FeedRinse for creating filters within your different feed folders. Feedrinse is an effective way to filter your feeds but if you have to monitor a range of feeds for various terms it is definitely not the most elegant solution.

So, which readers do offer an easy filter feature that are easy to configure?…

Desktop: NetNewsWire

For Mac, we recommend NetNewsWire. One big benefit is that it’s fast loading and easy to scroll through.

You can bookmark pages on the Delicious service, or by flagging or adding them to a clippings folder.

If you wish, it can order feeds by attention and unread count, with the aim of bringing the most important items to the top.

It has a “tabbed browser feature” which means you can click on an article to view it and then click back to continue scrolling through the next stories, without losing your place.

You can create “special subscriptions” which let you search tags on Flickr, or Delicious, or search terms on Twitter and Yahoo – giving you an integrated way to monitor social media and  your RSS feeds from one interface.

Smart folders are also handy: they organise items from your feeds according to pre-determined rules. For example, you can specify a specific keyword that must appear in the title and NetNewsWire will show items that fit this rule in the relevant Smart List. But there are other criteria you can specify for items as well: by author, link or its ‘read status’, for example.

Here’s a bit more detail. First, select the ‘New Smart List’ option under the ‘File’ tab.

Next, specify which key words you would like to filter. You can create more filter boxes by using the ‘+’ option on the right hand side. In the example below we’ve added four extra filter boxes:

There are several options for filtering as you can see below. It’s useful to specify the group name of a set of feeds (eg. ‘photography’) and within that, stories that match a specific search term (eg. title contains ‘police’).

The end result? A feed with all the stories matching those conditions.

Another option for Macs is NewsFire which has an uncluttered and intuitive interface but less functionality.

As a Windows equivalent, FeedDemon works very well. It has some really nifty features, which make it especially good for research purposes.

You can create Search Feeds that tell you when a keyword appears in any feed; whether it’s one you subscribe to or not. You can manually tag items by keyword and then view by tag.

It also has filtering options, called ‘Content Filters’ but these are only available in the paid for Pro version. However, in the basic free version you can set up Watch alerts for when certain keywords appear in any feeds you’re subscribed too.

Resulting in a feed like this:

Mobile: Reeder

We tried out a few readers for iPhone, but found Reeder to perform really well. It syncs efficiently with Google Reader. The bottom navigation allows you to jump between ‘starred’, ‘unread’ and ‘all items’.

It’s a very simple interface, but for reading RSS by your phone that’s all you really need. You can easily scroll up and down stories to read and there are a range of sharing options via social media and also quick functions for copying and emailing links, saving to ‘pinboard’ or making a note.

Of course, they are plenty of alternative RSS readers and aggregators to try out too. You can find some more suggestions on this list provided by BBC News. Download software and find even more via CNet at this link. Wikipedia has a very comprehensive list here. We’ll be reviewing more in the near future.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Journalists and the social web – Oslo Seminar

I am just back from the seminar on Journalists and the Social Web in Oslo organised by the Norwegian Journalist Kristine Lowe, Journalism.co.uk and Journalisten.no. The day went really well with some fascinating discussion and I’d like to thank the hosts for their generous hospitality. I spoke at the seminar on several subjects including Mining Social Networks for Information, Monitoring News and The Semantic Web and journalists. Here are my presentations:

Journalists and the Social Web 1 – Mining for Information

Journalists and the Social Web 2 – Monitoring your Beat

Journalists and the Social Web 3 – Journalists and the Semantic Web

Tags: , , ,

EverNote – 10 reasons why journalists and researchers should love it

October 2nd, 2008 | 5 Comments | Posted by Colin Meek in Filter content, Social Networks, Sorting and Storing

Over the last few years a number of notebook applications have elbowed their way into the mainstream market including Google Notebook, Zoho Notebook, Ubernote and iLeonardo. A few of these apps were discussed in this Mashable post recently. One of the most recent note-taking apps to emerge is Evernote – an incredibly powerful creation that works on both Macs and Windows. I’ve looked at Evernote from the perspective of a journalist and researcher and found ten reasons to love it.

1 – It does the basics really well. I hope the people at EverNote never lose sight of this. Journalists and researchers use notebook apps so they can quickly and efficiently file away snippets, web pages, documents and pictures into subject files. They also need to be able to dump this content into the note-taking app in a variety of ways and access those notes easily. Evernote has this mastered.
2 – EverNote works on the web and your desktop. Sounds like a source of confusion but the automatic syncing means both operate seamlessly. You can, however, create notebooks only on the web version or only on your desktop.
3 – You can publish your notebooks to collaborate with colleagues on projects.
4 – You can tag notes. Making it easier to search for notes across and within notebooks.
5 – Notes can be emailed easily. Single or multiple notes can be selected and then one click attaches those notes as PDFs to a new message window from your email client.
6 – You can email notes directly into your EverNote account.
7 – EverNote search includes image recognition technology. While not universally applauded, this image recognition capability means you can automatically search through pictures that carry text. If you have taken snaps of business cards, for example, you can search them automatically.
8 – You can import and export. This means that as you build data using the service and catalogue items you can export them later to a different app on a different platform.
9 – The web and desktop interfaces work beautifully. You can view notes in various forms, zoom in and out, view specific notes in one column or work on a specific note by adding text or images.
10 – It’s about to get better. Yesterday EverNote announced released its all-access API which means that developers can mash the service with other apps. The company hopes, for example, that it can be integrated with scheduling services such as Ical and Remember the Milk. This also means that the social bookmarking element of EverNote (published notebooks) may become intergrated with other social networking sites. It also says that new Mac and Windows scripting capabilities mean that you can automate specific processes and add functionality such as RSS feeds

There are other reasons why EverNote has attracted praise; for example, I’ve yet to explore how easily you can create and browse notes via mobiles. One downside might be that the free version allows a maximum data upload of 40mb per month. Even so, $5 will give you access to 500mb which is enough to store 5,000 snaps.

More on Evernote mashups soon.

Tags: , , , ,

Information overload is just filter failure

September 25th, 2008 | No Comments | Posted by Colin Meek in Featured, Filter content, Monitoring Tools

Search for the term ‘overload’ in delicious or Digg and you’ll see dozens of stories on ‘information overload’. We’re all drowning under a tsunami of e-mail, RSS, bookmarks and updates – and the story hasn’t moved on for 5 or even 10 years. Someone will soon identify the best 10 posts on the best 10 ways to beat information overload. 

But we may be looking at this issue through the wrong end of the telescope. If we always think about information overload as a problem, can we really make sure we turn to right tools for the solution?

Not according to Clay Shirky speaking at the Web 2.0 Expo in New York last week. In his excellent talk he concludes that the internet has introduced a new economics where the cost of publishing has “fallen through the floor”. As a result, he argues, that the filter for quality has been pushed further and further downstream of the site of production. The crux, according to this logic, is that filter failure is the problem – not information overload. The solution is that have to use different filter tools. You have to re-tune them. You have to accept that your filters will fail and will need to be rebuilt. The lessons here for effective research are obvious. “If you have the same problem for a long time – maybe it’s not a problem, maybe it’s a fact.”

Web 2.0 Expo NY: Clay Shirky (shirky.com) It\'s Not Information Overload. It\'s Filter Failure.

Tags:

Welcome

Welcome to insite. A www.journalism.co.uk blog that will cover everything related to internet research. insite is written and edited by Colin Meek who delivers training courses in Advanced Internet Research for journalism.co.uk the National Union of Journalists and for other clients on an in-house basis.