Mo George jury didn't understand libel trial, claims News Group lawyer
Jury in libel action ruled against Sun newspaper to favour 'little man', suggests Tom Crone
Jury in libel action ruled against Sun newspaper to favour 'little man', suggests Tom Crone
This article was migrated from an old version of our website in 2025. As a result, it might have some low-quality images or non-functioning links - if there's any issues you'd like to see fixed, get in touch with us at info@journalism.co.uk.
The jury in the libel trial of former Eastenders actor Mo George against the Sun newspaper did not understand the proceedings, according to one member of the team. Last month George won £75,000 in damages from the newspaper following an article in the paper that alleged he beat up his lover and mother of his child.
The action cost the title £1,000,000, News Group Newspaper's senior lawyer Tom Crone told a parliamentary committee on press standards, privacy and libel today.
But, in a chance meeting in a pub after the trial, a juror told a member of the paper's defence team the jury had not understood the trial.
"'There was a big rich newspaper on one side and the little guy, so we decided to give it to the little guy'," the juror reportedly said, claimed Crone.
"You can have a two-week trial and the jury comes out the other end of it not understanding what's happened," added News of the World editor Colin Myler.
Under UK libel law the 'burden of proof' lies with the defendant, which has become 'a very onerous burden for newspapers', added Crone.
Myler and Crone were giving evidence on press standards, privacy and libel to a hearing of a House of Commons select committee . More coverage to follow on Journalism.co.uk.