Journalism in Crisis 09: Media in crisis faces five recurrent problems, says professor
Problems in modern-day journalism not necessarily remedied by the web, suggests James Curran
Problems in modern-day journalism not necessarily remedied by the web, suggests James Curran
This article was migrated from an old version of our website in 2025. As a result, it might have some low-quality images or non-functioning links - if there's any issues you'd like to see fixed, get in touch with us at info@journalism.co.uk.
There used to be something here that couldn't be migrated - please contact us at info@journalism.co.uk if you'd like to see this updated!
A new set of public interventions, adapted to meet the individual contexts of each country, are needed to remedy recurrent flaws in American and European journalism, Professor James Curran outlined in the first keynote speech of the two-day Journalism in Crisis conference .
Speaking to an audience of students, media professionals and academics at the Westminster University event in association with British Journalism Review, Curran, professor of communications at Goldsmiths University of London said that the net addressed some elements, but not all the weaknesses of modern journalism.
Making distinctions between the way that US and UK news operations work in terms of news culture and public funding and regulation, he identified a 'crisis in media reformism' with five recurrent problems, summarised below:
Examining each of these five problems in the context of the web, Curran said he is not convinced greater online participation would solve them - though he did highlight particular areas of success, for example, the investigative efforts of the Politico news site.
"It would appear that the web is not a self-correcting mechanism," he said. But, he added more optimistically, there was a new 'feedback loop' in place for journalism, not available before the internet.