12 tips for covering traumatic stories remotely
Acknowledge physical reactions, regain a sense of agency and set clear expectations - here is how to safeguard your mental health when covering the Ukrainian war
Acknowledge physical reactions, regain a sense of agency and set clear expectations - here is how to safeguard your mental health when covering the Ukrainian war
This article was migrated from an old version of our website in 2025. As a result, it might have some low-quality images or non-functioning links - if there's any issues you'd like to see fixed, get in touch with us at info@journalism.co.uk.
In the week since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, I have seen and heard increasing numbers of journalism colleagues struggling with the effects of covering the conflict and news remotely.
It is different from the experience of those on the ground, of course, who face direct threats to their physical, psychological and digital safety, but the potential for vicarious trauma is significant.
After two exhausting and unprecedented years of a global pandemic, in which many of us have experienced anxiety, uncertainty, personal and professional stresses, it is important to know how to manage our mental health, even when we are physically far from a rapidly changing and traumatic story.
Vicarious trauma is the idea that people can become affected by experiences they are not directly exposed to. I remember working in a London newsroom in 2003, during the US-led invasion of Iraq and being asked to watch the live agency feed of the bombing of Baghdad. I was 25 years old, less than five years into my career.
On that March night, no senior journalists warned me about the horrors I would see, or advised me to limit my exposure, turn down the volume of the video and take regular breaks. Nobody offered to speak with me afterwards or warned me of the nightmares I would have, or how the only way I would briefly forget what I heard and saw was by drinking myself into oblivion. I know these reactions were my way of coping with vicarious trauma and I wish I had been better prepared to manage my mental health.
Exposure to such images does not automatically mean we are going to develop vicarious trauma. We may react with anger or sadness in the moment, but it is important to recognise the potential of a longer-term impact on our wellbeing.
It was not until almost a decade after my experiences that the term vicarious trauma started being used in newsrooms. As the growth of social media coincided with revolutions across the Arab world and the rise of the Islamic State, it meant anyone with access to a smartphone could upload high-quality images online, no matter how graphic or genuine.
It is not just viewing images that can impact us. Hearing the stories of those affected by trauma can also be distressing. The past two years have taken their toll on many journalists, for whom empathy is both a characteristic that enables them to bring humanity to their work and one that means they may be more sensitive to vicarious trauma.
The global health crisis has not only exacerbated the volume of news and noise but being hyper-connected to the biggest news story in living memory, often working from home where our personal and professional lives blur, has brought added pressures to our ability to process what we experience at second hand.
So, what can we do practically to protect our mental health, when dealing with secondary trauma, and still trying to cope with the pressures of the pandemic?
The following tips are distilled from my years working in media safety and mental health, although it is important to note I am a journalist, not a clinician.
Hannah Storm is a media consultant specialising in journalism safety, crisis management and effective, empathetic leadership. She is the founder and co-director of Headlines Network, a community set up to promote more open conversations around mental health in the media.