Sun editor: Page 3 'part of British society'

This article was migrated from an old version of our website in 2025. As a result, it might have some low-quality images or non-functioning links - if there's any issues you'd like to see fixed, get in touch with us at info@journalism.co.uk.

There used to be something here that couldn't be migrated - please contact us at info@journalism.co.uk if you'd like to see this updated!

Sun editor Dominic Mohan has responded to women's rights groups calling for topless Page 3 photos to be banned - by arguing that the feature has become "a British institution". Four women's groups have given evidence to the Leveson inquiry , arguing for a ban on topless photographs of women in newspapers, and more than 40 per cent of women in the UK would support a ban, according to a poll by women's charity Platform 51 published earlier today .

Mohan told the Leveson inquiry today: "This was first published 42 years ago and i think it represents youth and freshness. It celebrates natural beauty - we don't have models with plastic surgery. It's obviously legal. It's become an innocuous British institution.

"As a parent myself I'm more concerned about images they might find on the internet."

He added: "The ultimate sanction lies with the reader. I think it is tolerated by the majority of British society. I don't think the images are sexualised in the way that even some clothed images in magazines are.

"I think it's worth looking at Page 3 in a wider context of women's issues that we cover. The Page 3 girls have become ambassadors for the paper. I think you shouldn't look at Page 3 in isolation."

He highlighted a campaign against domestic violence, for example, led by the newspaper in 2003 as evidence.

The Sun has printed topless photos of women on page 3 since 1970.