This article was migrated from an old version of our website in 2025. As a result, it might have some low-quality images or non-functioning links - if there's any issues you'd like to see fixed, get in touch with us at info@journalism.co.uk.
Prime minister David Cameron has insisted "there was no grand deal"
between himself and the Murdochs, but accepted politicians and the
media have become "too close".
David Cameron, who made the comments on the Andrew Marr Show
on Sunday , is reportedly facing
calls to make a statement to the House of Commons today on his
response to evidence in the Leveson inquiry showing contact between
the office of culture secretary Jeremy Hunt and News Corporation
during its bid for BSkyB, which Cameron has branded as "too close,
too frequent" and "inappropriate".
Hunt's special advisor Adam Smith resigned last week after evidence was submitted to
the Leveson inquiry containing
emails from News Corporation's head of public affairs, suggesting
contact was being made with Hunt's office, said to be via
Smith.
Former News International chairman James Murdoch told the inquiry they were "receiving feedback and information" but denied it was
covert. In a statement Smith said the "the content and extent" of his
contact with News Corporation during the BSkyB bid "was done
without authorisation from the secretary of state" and said his
activities "at times went too far".
In Sunday's interview with Andrew Marr, Cameron faced questions
about his own relationship with the Murdochs. The prime minister
said it "is not true" that "there was some big agreement between me
and Rupert Murdoch or James Murdoch, that in return for support for
the Conservative party I would somehow help their business
interests or allow this merger to go through."
"Rupert Murdoch said it under oath at the Leveson inquiry, James
Murdoch said it under oath, I'll say it under oath."
He added that it "would be absolutely wrong for there to be any
sort of deal, and there wasn't".
"The whole thing falls down. There was no grand deal. Did I spend
time trying to win over proprietors? Yes. Did I spend time with the
Guardian and Independent? Yes. Did I spend a lot of time with the
BBC political editors? Yes I did. That is what politicians have to
do.
"Have we all got too close? Yes. Do we spend too much time on the
short-term news management agenda? Yes we do."
But he added that "the positions I reach are because I believe in
them. I do not do things, change my policies to suit this
proprietor or that proprietor, that's not the way I work."
Cameron was also asked about his decision not to call for an
investigation into Hunt in relation to the ministerial code.
"This must be properly investigated – and it will. The ministerial
code is for me, the behaviour of ministers is for me. I don't duck
my responsibilities for one second. If that has happened I will
act.
"But, what is best way of getting information about what actually
happened? I don't believe there's any better process than an
inquiry led by a judge where people give evidence under oath. That
is why after consulting the cabinet secretary I thought it not
right to carry out a parallel inquiry."
He added this does not necessarily mean he will wait for Lord
Justice Leveson to report but that "if information arises that
paints a different picture from the one we heard then obviously I
know my responsiblity towards the ministerial code."
But he said at this stage: "I don't believe Jeremy Hunt breached
ministerial code".
In his own statement to the House of Commons last week Hunt said accusations that he backed News Corporation's bid for
BSkyB are "laughable" and "categorically" denied allegations of
a "back channel" giving News Corporation the ability to influence
decisions.