Email newsletters are overlooked as an audience engagement channel by media outlets in the UK, found a report published today by Polis, the journalism think tank at the London School of Economics.
Newsletters sent straight to readers' inboxes by individual journalists or news organisations have become a popular trend in recent years, making the most of a communication channel otherwise considered old-school.
But while publishers in the US have taken full advantage of the opportunities email brings to the table, there's still room for more experiments in the UK, according to the report.
The report, called 'Back to the Future – Email Newsletters as a Digital Channel for Journalism', was written by Swedish journalist Charlotte Fagerlund and was supported by Journalistfonden.
Fagerlund interviewed journalists who work with email newsletters, looking to establish some best practices as well as the current opportunities on email.We're all really worried about having to do all our journalism dissemination through digital intermediaries like Facebook or Twitter, and here's an opportunity to reach our readers directlyCharlie Beckett, Polis
Charlie Beckett, director of Polis and one of the editors of the report, told Journalism.co.uk that while producing newsletters can be resource-intensive, they open a direct line of communication between a media organisation and its audience.
"I am somewhat surprised that people aren't more enthusiastic. It seems to me that we're all really worried about having to do all our journalism dissemination through digital intermediaries like Facebook or Twitter, and here's an opportunity to reach our readers directly."
Aside from providing an alternative to Facebook and Twitter, another advantage of email newsletters is reaching audiences on mobile, outlined the report.
“A lot of people forget this when they think of mobile – they think of apps. But email is inherently mobile. Everyone has email on their smartphones, and email looks great on your phone because you’re so limited. You basically only have words, links and images, beyond that there’s not much else," said Millie Tran, editor of the BuzzFeed News newsletter, quoted in the report.
Other advantages highlighted by the report were:
- updated email clients ensure there's less spam in people's inboxes;
- newsletter subscribers tend to be loyal readers, and emails will remind them to "read more widely";
- newsletters are digestible, [they] "have a beginning and an end";
- email is easy to use and familiar to most people, unlike newer platforms and technologies which might not have generated as much interest among the general public as they have among journalists;
- the messages are more personal, and many check emails before social networks in the morning;
- email readers can be a good target group for advertising.
"But whereas the American market might be seeing too many newsletters being sent out already, the UK is not there yet," said Fagerlund in the report.
Beckett pointed to projects like theSkimm, where the team created an entire business around an email newsletter.
"Obviously they've got a bigger market to reach so perhaps they can experiment more, but perhaps it is a slightly more entrepreneurial approach in the States," he said.
Free daily newsletter
- 'Personal approach and honesty' are the secret to membership success during the coronavirus pandemic
- Newsrooms are not racist but...
- Take part in the Journalism.co.uk readership survey
- Kim Bui, director of audience innovation at Arizona Republic, and David Cohn, co-founder of Subtext, on building reader relationships via SMS
- "TikTok does not have the same environment for media partners as Snapchat"